Tier 1 · prepared to order
Article 50 readiness report
You submit a structured questionnaire; a person reads it and returns a written classification and gap list.
What you get
- Structured questionnaire covering your systems and their outputs
- Written classification per system, with the reasoning
- Gap list, ordered by what bites first
- Human-reviewed, not generated
- Cross-jurisdiction annex: EU, China, India, US and UK
Three ways to tell whether this applies to you.
If none of these describes your situation, this is the wrong product, and the catalog has nine others.
- You want the classification done for you rather than done by you
- You have a deadline and would rather spend three business days than three weeks
- You need something written down that a reviewer outside your team can follow
The file, before you buy it
Read from the artifact itself rather than described, so what is printed here and what arrives cannot drift apart.
Every column, as it ships
Highlighted below and bracketed above: q_∗ × 5.
- 01
system_id - 02
system_name - 03
one_line_description - 04
lifecycle_status - 05
our_role - 06
eu_nexus - 07
first_placed_or_put_into_service - 08
q_interacts_with_people - 09
q_generates_or_manipulates_content - 10
q_emotion_or_biometric - 11
q_deepfake_content - 12
q_generated_text_public_interest - 13
who_sees_the_output - 14
is_output_published_unreviewed - 15
can_it_take_actions - 16
vendor_name_if_bought - 17
your_current_view - 18
open_question_for_us
intake-questionnaire.html
5 sections, in the same download.
- Section A · About you
- Section B · The systems
- Section C · What makes it complete
- Section D · How we handle what you send
- What you get back
ai-transparency-by-jurisdiction.html
5 sections, in the same download.
- The shape of the problem
- One screen
- Jurisdiction by jurisdiction
- What to build once
- Sources, and the honest status of each figure
The shape of the work
The only item here that is an engagement rather than a download, so the figure is its three stages and the real size of each.
Three of the schedule's columns ask what Article 50 never does: who sees the output, whether it is published unreviewed and whether the system can act. Those are what decide whether a system is a different size of problem.
Section A · About youSection B · The systemsSection C · What makes it completeSection D · How we handle what you sendWhat you get back
who_sees_the_outputis_output_published_unreviewedcan_it_take_actions
The two rules that govern every reportThe report structureThe delivery runbookThe dates, in one place
SourceSection headings and column names read from the three files in deliverables/T1-AIA-04/ at build time.
Delivery and license
Stated here rather than in the terms, because these are the questions asked before a purchase and not after it.
- Delivery
- Three business days from receipt of a completed questionnaire.
- License
- The report is yours. It is written for your organization and is not licensed for resale.
What it is not
- Not a legal opinion
- Does not include remediation work
HTML and CSV · Intake questionnaire plus an 18-column system schedule · Version 1.0 · 21 September 2026
What usually goes with this
Each of these does something this one does not, and the line under it says what. They are separate items, not an upsell path.
EU AI Act Article 50 self-assessment toolkit
The same classification as a worksheet you run yourself, if you would rather do the work than commission it.
$149
Transparency disclosure pack
The report names the disclosures you owe. This is the drafted text for each one.
$249
AI system inventory template
The report covers the systems you submit. The inventory is how the rest stay current afterwards.
$99
Before you ask
These are the same strings this page puts in its structured data, so a person and an answer engine read identical text.
Can I buy this today?
Yes. It is $890, one payment, in USD, and a person prepares it and sends it back to you.
What does buying this actually get us?
A way to work out where you stand and to evidence it. Compliance is a property of your systems and your records rather than of a document, so this gives you the structure to establish both, and the output is written to be handed to whoever reviews it.
Who issues the certificate for a standard like ISO/IEC 42001?
The certificate comes from an accredited certification body, after its own audit that you commission directly. What MetaMinds does is gap assessment, readiness, control design and evidence preparation, which is the work that audit then examines.
What if I want the work done rather than the file?
The fixed-scope engagements on the services page cover the same ground with a person doing the work, at a published price and a fixed duration. Those are available now: a vendor AI assessment at $2,500 over three days is the smallest, an EU AI Act readiness assessment is $4,900 over one week, and an ISO/IEC 42001 gap assessment is $8,900 over two to three weeks.
What exactly is Article 50 readiness report?
You submit a structured questionnaire; a person reads it and returns a written classification and gap list. It is a Tier 1 instant product from MetaMinds, listed at $890 in USD as a single payment. Tier 1 is the entry rung of a three-tier catalog: instant products from $99 to $890, fixed-scope engagements from $2,500 to $8,900, and scoped builds from $18,000.
What happens after I pay?
A person reads what you submitted and sends the written result back to you, with your invoice. Because a file you have already downloaded cannot be returned, the checkout asks you to confirm before paying that downloading ends your 14-day right to withdraw. That is Article 16(m) of the Consumer Rights Directive, and it is why the box is there and why it starts unticked.
Need this sooner than it ships?
The engagements on the services page cover the same ground with a person doing the work, at a fixed price and a fixed duration. They are available now.